Careful, you're responding to a summary of the Stochastic Parrot paper, but not the paper itself, which isn't structured this way. For instance, the paper does

Careful, you're responding to a summary of the Stochastic Parrot paper, but not the paper itself, which isn't structured this way. For instance, the paper doesn't raises model collapse (not using that term) as a risk, a possibility. It doesn't predict it with certainty, unlike this summary, which appears to believe something like it has actually occurred.