3 ms·
Qwen 3.5 9B is great for coding, but somehow, based on a few hours of subjetive tests, the Gemma 4 12B seems even better.
by ricardobayes 5mo ago
Qwen 3.5 9B is great for coding, but somehow, based on a few hours of subjetive tests, the Gemma 4 12B seems even better.
- mark_l_watson 5mo agoI had odd Gemma 4 12B results: it was ‘almost excellent’ for writing code in a variety of languages if I was using a detailed one-shot prompt describing new code to write. I had horrible luck with Gemma 4 12B with a variety of coding harnesses - but as usual Qwen 3.5 9B did OK. EDIT: CORRECTION: I pulled a fresh copy of Gemma 4 12B and inference code and the tool use problems in my test harnesses are fixed. Gemma 4 12B is slow on my 16B MacBook Air, put produces OK results.