3 ms·

I'm talking about Techcrunch and Bloomberg's decisions to report this as news, and the actions of whoever conveyed the information from within Apple to reporter

• snogglethorpe 14y ago
  It is news, of course... and news many people are actually interested in, not so much for the name of the guy (they could have left that out), but for what it says about Apple's reaction to the Apple Maps debacle: that they're taking it seriously and not just treating it as a PR issue.
  • qq66 14y ago
    Leaving out his name would have made all the difference.