2 ms·
For ~equivalent tasks/results, or because we’re expecting more or better from tasks? The real measure should be cost per ~equivalent task result, not cost per
by no-name-here 5mo ago
For ~equivalent tasks/results, or because we’re expecting more or better from tasks?
The real measure should be cost per ~equivalent task result, not cost per token nor tokens per task.
- bandrami 5mo agoFor better performance of ~equivalent tasks. That's what all the harness tooling people are using does: (often) increasing output quality by significantly increasing token counts.