3 ms·
It's a standard ISO Standard thing which could perhaps be justified when standards where printed on paper. The JPEG XL team released a draft to try to work aro
by ZeroGravitas 5mo ago
It's a standard ISO Standard thing which could perhaps be justified when standards where printed on paper.
The JPEG XL team released a draft to try to work around this but couldn't avoid it for the official standard release.
- 201984 5mo agoDoes anyone know why the JPEG XL team went through ISO instead of publishing it themselves?
- ksec 5mo agoBecause it is an international standard accepted by government and many other parties.
- 201984 5mo agoI just don't get why an image format needs the ceremony from being an international standard accepted by governments. It's just an image format; governments shouldn't be involved in this at all. What did ISO give the JPEG XL team that made paywalling the standard worth it? Did ISO pay them or something?
- ksec 5mo agoI think you got it the other way around. It is JPEG XL has to pay for it to be published by ISO and certified. And the document will be edited and audited in part. And in turns government choose format that is protected and safest to use. ISO is ( or was ) part of that equation.