3 ms·
Lots of assumptions off a comment that is mostly just me stating my preference for short and unique part numbers. Nothing would be wrong with ESP32xx ESP33xx, E
by alnwlsn 4mo ago
Lots of assumptions off a comment that is mostly just me stating my preference for short and unique part numbers. Nothing would be wrong with ESP32xx ESP33xx, ESP34xx, etc.
Espressif only have 312 SKUs [0]. You're telling me nobody could come up with a naming scheme where more than 2/3 of them don't have part numbers longer than 18 characters?
Doesn't really matter either way, but short part numbers do fit nicely in a BOM table without using really wide columns. (even though I usually find capacitors to have even longer names).
0 - https://products.espressif.com/#/product-selector https://products.espressif.com/#/product-selector
- peteforde 4mo agoYou're going to really, really hate learning about STM32 MCUs. https://www.digikey.ca/short/2v4t0n5m https://www.digikey.ca/short/2v4t0n5m
- alnwlsn 4mo agoHaha, that I did! I spent a good while narrowing down that very list to pick one of my first ones out last year. By coincidence, I ran into the very same part number in a completely different circumstance a few months later. What are the chances of that!? Did help me feel that I hadn't picked out a real oddball one though. Part number was still just 15 characters, and that's enough to specify if you want the tape and reel version. Not that anyone's counting :). I guess those long part numbers do get burned into your head after a while after all.
- simgt 4mo agoYou really come across as condescending and patronizing.
- peteforde 4mo ago¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Honestly, I just know what I'm talking about.