3 ms·
You're right, I skimmed over the latter part of your comment. I don't know about your claim that M1/M2 will outperform Wildcat Lake in performance and battery l
by static_motion 4mo ago
You're right, I skimmed over the latter part of your comment. I don't know about your claim that M1/M2 will outperform Wildcat Lake in performance and battery life though, do we know specific figures to be able to say that for sure?
- cromka 4mo agoM1/M2 matches Panther lake i5 chips in performance and still excels at efficiency. Hard to imagine Wildcat can do anything extra here.
- static_motion 4mo agoI'm sorry but your first claim has no basis in reality. Any benchmark shows the lowest end Panther Lake chip performing at least 15% faster than M1 and 10% faster than M2 in single core performance which is where Apple Silicon excels, and greatly outperforming them in both multi-core and GPU performance while having equivalent battery life.
- cromka 4mo agohttps://www.cpubenchmark.net/compare/7322vs4922/Intel-5-315-vs-Apple-M2-8-3500-MHz https://www.cpubenchmark.net/compare/7322vs4922/Intel-5-315-... Not sure what you're referring to. 5-10% of different is exactly what I meant by "matching". The real-life battery numbers also don't support your statement, as tested by e.g. notebookcheck.com And, again, the actual context is Wildcat Lake here, an step down from Panther Lake.