My point implies that you have to be dynamic. If your evaluation methods are static for too long they get hacked. You have to balance that though. Change too of

My point implies that you have to be dynamic. If your evaluation methods are static for too long they get hacked. You have to balance that though. Change too often and your system is overly expensive and cumbersome. Change too infrequently and the cheaters end up at the top. You're right that it can always be worse but you're wrong to say that we can't do better now