3 ms·
Obviously. But it's really nice to have the option, and none of us knows the future. I've been bitten by those "0.1% chance" things much more times than I would
by pdimitar 4mo ago
Obviously. But it's really nice to have the option, and none of us knows the future. I've been bitten by those "0.1% chance" things much more times than I would be not-embarrassed to admit, and I know I a not alone.
- andersmurphy 4mo agoI believe the point they were making is you can have millions of virtual threads on the JVM no problem. Your information on the JVM is outdated.
- pdimitar 4mo agoGood, thanks for the grounding. I'll have to reevaluate at one point then. As I just posted in another comment (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48384622 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48384622), I'd probably drop Erlang/Elixir due to difficulties of employment and contracting -- if the more popular languages get those STM / share-nothing runtimes.