> You cannot reduce risk, you can only replace it with another". I don't understand why you would say this. Is it not the case that using a language with autom

> You cannot reduce risk, you can only replace it with another". I don't understand why you would say this. Is it not the case that using a language with automatic memory management (say, Python) is less risky than using one with manual memory manamgement (say, C or C++)? There are tradeoffs (e.g. performance, having less control over various things), but they are not tradeoffs between one risk and another risk, they are tradeoffs between risk and something else.