3 ms·
For anyone trying to figure out how to build a society where no one wants to be a criminal, I highly recommend When Brute Force Fails: How to Have Less Crime an
by gdudeman 4mo ago
For anyone trying to figure out how to build a society where no one wants to be a criminal, I highly recommend When Brute Force Fails: How to Have Less Crime and Less Punishment by Mark Kleiman.
There are evidence-backed ways of reducing criminality.
One counterintuitive way of reducing crime is to increase the likelihood of being caught, to have small-but-increasing consequences for committing crimes, and to increase the swiftness of sentencing.
For example, if you are caught drinking and driving, you immediately spend 1-2 days in jail.
Long sentences are not very productive at reducing crime or at least are a very inefficient way to do so.
- senderista 4mo agoScott Alexander has a good analysis of these issues: https://www.astralcodexten.com/p/prison-and-crime-much-more-than-you https://www.astralcodexten.com/p/prison-and-crime-much-more-...
- Gigachad 4mo agoAn intuitive way to understand it is imagining that there was a system where if you stole something, you 100% of the time got hit with a charge to your account of the item value + $10. No one would steal again even if the penalty for getting caught was relatively nothing. Because the feedback loop is so short and guaranteed. No ones life would be ruined over a dumb choice and yet they would change their behavior very fast.
- bombcar 4mo agoYou have to deal with the judgement-proof somehow. There’s effectively two sets of laws - one for those with something to lose (fines, etc) and one for those with nothing to lose.
- Gigachad 4mo agoIt’s still the same. If you steal something and have no money you lose the item and get some small penalty, perhaps a day in jail. If there is absolutely no chance you’d get away with it, everyone quickly realises there is no point.