4 ms·
Then there should be a law that requires the platform to interoperate with independent clients. You can't have both. The social network is a common good. If you
by exe34 4mo ago
Then there should be a law that requires the platform to interoperate with independent clients. You can't have both. The social network is a common good. If you want to benefit from it, then you need to treat people fairly.
- skeledrew 4mo ago> The social network is a common good. Not if it's managed by a company, in which case it's a means to turn a profit. A common good needs to be managed by the community to which it's providing said good, or by an entity that's legally bound to ensure it remains "good" for the community.
- exe34 4mo agoThe whole rationale to giving companies a charter was to enable things that are good for the community. Just because it would be profitable to kill some people, for example, doesn't mean that companies can just do it (unless they are medical insurance companies in the US).
- skeledrew 4mo agoIt's actually against the law in general to kill someone though. And without some reasonable form of enforcement, the charter thing is just for show.
- exe34 4mo agothis is such a low iq take. my whole point was that there should be a law for X, and now we're at "oh but there's a law for Y".