3 ms·
It is not "clear", as your comment suggests, it's hidden. Which is semantically the opposite of clear. Regarding your theory, might be true, might be false. Bu
by jb_briant 4mo ago
It is not "clear", as your comment suggests, it's hidden. Which is semantically the opposite of clear. Regarding your theory, might be true, might be false. But it's highly speculative.
- Forgeties79 4mo agoAll of us, including you, know that he is not saying "they are being transparent." When someone says "it's clear that..." in this way they're saying "It's clear to us what is really happening here.
- WhitneyLand 4mo agoThe not clear comment is valid by either interpretation. To a lot of us it’s not clear that’s what’s happening. It’s speculation and one possibility. It may also be a secondary consideration and not the primary gating factor. Anthropic has had their missteps but it’s still plausible to take what they say at face value.
- jb_briant 4mo agoI agree, saying "it's clear" when at best, "it's plausible" doesn't let the conversation happen. And pretending to know what is going on behind the scene, anon on HN is not credible
- jb_briant 4mo agoIt's not clear, there is no tangible proof that Mythos is not released because they don't have compute power to serve it. Saying that would imply that the "too dangerous" is a lie. Nobody has proof. It can feel "clear" for you, but it's not. Hence, I correct it.
- Forgeties79 4mo agoAgreed, but I'm talking about how they are, very clearly, using the phrase.
- jb_briant 4mo agoYes I got how they used the phrase. And it was wrong, so I wanted to react. Thanks for your addition, it dissipates any doubt on the intention of OP: he thinks Anthropic is hiding the lack of power by pretending it's too dangerous. But he is wrong to assume that without proof, hence my reaction.