I agree in that I don't think the interview contributed very much, other than to propagate his quirky reputation But reading your comment makes it sound like t

I agree in that I don't think the interview contributed very much, other than to propagate his quirky reputation But reading your comment makes it sound like that's all there is to him - it isn't. I found his book brilliant - the quirkiness in no way made it any less informative or useful, and only made it more enjoyable. I encourage anybody who hasn't read it, or who want's to learn Ruby, to take a look at http://poignantguide.net/ruby/ http://poignantguide.net/ruby/ Since he's able to contribute/create/do as much as he does, I say let him do it in any way he wants. Apparently he finds it fun to create and preform a character.