4 ms·
That’s fine as long as I can identify and reject any Mythos derived patch as being irreproducible.
by cmxch 4mo ago
That’s fine as long as I can identify and reject any Mythos derived patch as being irreproducible.
- IanCal 4mo agoWhy would it not be reproducible?
- cmxch 4mo agoIts analysis from prompt/harness to end products.
- IanCal 4mo agoYou can't do that for me either. Why would you refuse to use a patch that deals with a valid PoC exploit? If a random contributor posted an explanation of an exploit, showed it worked in an executable way, presented a patch and you could see that the exploit no longer worked - would you refuse to use the fix until the contributor showed how they figured it out?
- cmxch 4mo agoGiven where Mythos alleges to go, reproducibility far beyond a hash promise, an alleged (but not really proven) existence of an PoC, and “Trust me bro” is necessary. When an ungated (or even abliterated) public model can repeatedly, easily, and accurately embarrass Anthropic’s models, that might change.
- astrange 4mo agoHow can a patch be "reproducible"? The testcases are reproducible.
- cmxch 4mo agoHow Mythos’s mysterymeat got there from front to back.