3 ms·
> Whoever finds a reliable way to keep AI out of an online community first is likely to become a very rich person. I believe it’s the opposite: You have to pay
by layer8 5mo ago
> Whoever finds a reliable way to keep AI out of an online community first is likely to become a very rich person.
I believe it’s the opposite: You have to pay competent human moderators. Like here on HN.
- LtWorf 5mo agoHalf the posts here are AI grifting.
- whyenot 5mo agoThat’s a pretty extraordinary claim. Do you have anything quantitative to back it up? HN has bots, I think that is a fair assumption, but half? How do you know that for sure?
- GroksBarnacles 5mo ago[flagged]
- dcuthbertson 5mo agoTIL that statements of obvious exaggeration are called causal, hyperbolic statements. Who knew? All kidding aside, I've never heard them called causal hyperbolic before. It's a good term.
- deleted 5mo ago[deleted]