4 ms·
He's been wrong a few times, but has been right far more than ONCE and appears to be profitably making decisions. For example: Short dot.com stocks (55% retur
by helsinkiandrew 5mo ago
He's been wrong a few times, but has been right far more than ONCE and appears to be profitably making decisions. For example:
Short dot.com stocks (55% return), short subprime mortgages (Massive return), long Gamestop 2019, short ARKK 2021, The shorts on Palantir and NVDA are probably still running (PLTR 25% in profit, NVDA 20% loss).
- turtlesdown11 5mo ago> long Gamestop 2019 So he really relies on zero fundamental analysis these days
- dgellow 5mo agoHe was early and had a clear thesis based on fundamentals, he had nothing to do with the short squeeze https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GameStop_short_squeeze#:~:text=However%2C%20in%20mid-2019%2C,revealed%20a%209-percent https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GameStop_short_squeeze#:~:text...
- chung8123 5mo agoThe Gamestop 2019 play was a fundamental analysis on supply and demand of the shares of the stock vs financial performance. TSLA seems to be similar. There is just a lot of demand for the the stock.