4 ms·
Not at all (hence saying "obvious in hindsight"). Simply pointing out that, at the time, my purchasing decision wasn't influenced by how many use cases it would
by kobieps 4mo ago
Not at all (hence saying "obvious in hindsight"). Simply pointing out that, at the time, my purchasing decision wasn't influenced by how many use cases it would restrict.
Also, IIRC, there was a period where you could burn Audio CDs from music that you purchased on iTunes.
edit: turns out music purchased on iTunes is DRM-free!
- cassianoleal 4mo ago> there was a period where you could burn Audio CDs from music that you purchased on iTunes. Music purchased on iTunes is DRM-free, so you can definitely burn CDs with them.
- kobieps 4mo agoAh very nice. I suppose it makes sense that music is DRM-free but films aren't
- rkagerer 4mo agoI suppose it makes sense that music is DRM-free but films aren't Why?
- crazygringo 4mo agoIt's orders of magnitude more expensive to make a movie than it is to make a track.
- kobieps 4mo agoyeah exactly
- HDBaseT 4mo agoand?
- crazygringo 4mo agoDid you read the question? It was an answer to the question.
- oxzidized 4mo agoNot to put words in their mouth, but my question would be: isn't that why movies are more expensive than an audio track? Not to mention that movies have "concerts" much more regularly and in many places at once where they make money, no? I don't really have an idea of the exact economics of it all, so these are genuine questions.
- t-3 4mo agoHaven't used iTunes in more than a decade, but it used to have options for converting files to different formats and burning playlists to disks and ripping CDs.