4 ms·
> They never come from Google, and the bad programmed ones just crawl several pages at a time, faster than a user could do. I’ve triggered this kind of “bot pr
by JimDabell 4mo ago
> They never come from Google, and the bad programmed ones just crawl several pages at a time, faster than a user could do.
I’ve triggered this kind of “bot protection” right here on Hacker News many times. I did that by having a bunch of Hacker News pages open and then closing and reopening my browser. I’ve also triggered it by opening a bunch of links in the background too quickly. I’ve also triggered it by reading the article, then clicking back and upvoting/favouriting too quickly. I’m also located in Singapore, which people have started to advocate for blocking here recently.
A single non-bot legitimate user can easily trigger these kinds of heuristics just by using the site in a way you don’t expect. This can affect some users disproportionately more than others, e.g. disabled people who need to use assistive technology.
- whstl 4mo agoOh I also do this all the time. What I mean by "too fast" is opening 50 pages in the span of two or three milliseconds. Either way, I'm not blocking. The CDN is handling the traffic alright.
- danielheath 4mo agoI hate that sort of thing - when I rolled my own proof-of-work bot protection (providers wanted $$$$), I set it up so that A) you'd have to open >200 tabs, and B) if any tab solves the proof-of-work, any that are still waiting to do so reload in the background.