4 ms·
This is honestly a very, very naive statement. We are social animals and we naturally gravitate towards devaluing and shaming certain styles of speech. We polic
by jdkoeck 4mo ago
This is honestly a very, very naive statement. We are social animals and we naturally gravitate towards devaluing and shaming certain styles of speech. We police speech already! It’s often unfortunate, but it’s not devoid of function. I, for one, am happy with shaming LLM speech. It’s never been so easy to detect lazy thinking.
- strken 4mo agoWhat do you think about TFA and its contention that perfectly normal language is being targeted by the AI witch-hunt? I personally avoid the em dash, but it has been used in writing for a long, long time.
- watwut 4mo agoFrankly, when humans produce empty reasoning like sentences with little reason behind them, we should be allowed to call it a slop too.
- strken 4mo agoWhat about when they produce correct reasoning and express it with language that has superficial similarities to LLM output?
- AlecSchueler 4mo ago> perfectly normal language Define "normal language?"
- strken 4mo agoIn this instance, language which would have passed a style guide and an editor in 2020 but reads as AI in 2026.
- notanastronaut 4mo agoSome could say with how quick one is to judge everyone against the lowest common denominator, that such decision making skills is itself, lazy.