17 ms·
> the latest occurring in 2000 26 years ago. That is not a current thing and isn't relevant.
by driverdan 4mo ago
> the latest occurring in 2000
26 years ago. That is not a current thing and isn't relevant.
- steele 4mo agoHey look, that person may have discovered that the introduction of Bluetooth on mobile phones somehow prevented future hijackings from being listed on Wikipedia with those keywords they grepped for. Let's not count out this water-tight approximation of commercial piloting procedure. Just think of how many incidents have been similarly prevented around that specific regional conflict by reducing legroom, shrinking overhead storage, and innumerable TSA back-of-the-hand bad touches.
- serialNumber 4mo agoThe latest was 9/11 and that is still quite relevant to us today.
- contubernio 4mo agoIt's as recent as WWII was when Nixon got elected.
- bonesss 4mo agoAnd Nixon followed through with countless post-WW2 policies, practices, and acted on concerns that stemmed specifically from that conflict. The Cold War and all related funding being an easy example. I’d also be very wary of recency bias when looking at the extremist fringes of religious and political situations that have been ongoing for centuries. We might feel a couple decades is a long time, but in conflicts all parties can veto the other parties subjective interpretations.
- no-name-here 4mo ago> quite relevant Quite relevant in terms of? Security (theater?) measures that have been allowed to continue?