What were you trying to say? Because what you wrote is what parent responded to. > there is no evidence that tridge did this regression testing What evidence

What were you trying to say? Because what you wrote is what parent responded to. > there is no evidence that tridge did this regression testing What evidence would you be looking for? New tests, like the ones added in the AI-assisted commits? What other evidence? > If tridge did test for regressions, but chose not to document the regression Presumably you weren't trying to imply here that tridge found a regression and decided to ship the code anyway; so parent went to a natural assumption - do you think testing for regressions finds all regressions?