3 ms·
The same could be said of UTF-16 implementations that don't support surrogate pairs.
by codeka 14y ago
The same could be said of UTF-16 implementations that don't support surrogate pairs.
- tlrobinson 14y agoBut that's not true for UCS-2, which can't represent certain code points. On the other hand, UTF-8 is ASCII compatible and more efficient for text that's primarily ASCII.