3 ms·
No that was because they hate our freedom, not because of decades of occupation and war all over the middle east funded by US taxpayer dollars.
by kennywinker 5mo ago
No that was because they hate our freedom, not because of decades of occupation and war all over the middle east funded by US taxpayer dollars.
- lostlogin 5mo agoI’d like to see a rebuttal to this comment. Is the US now safer after the Iran attacks?
- linkregister 5mo agoThe stated reasoning by Osama bin Laden in a letter published in 2002 [1] was primarily a response to grievances over the US support of Israel's occupation of Palestine, as well as a number of unrelated grievances mostly due to the choices of the various monarchies in the Gulf Arab states. For example, retaining a presence of U.S. troops in Saudi Arabia at the request of King Abdullah. It may be satisfying to affirm a world view in either direction in the topic, but an understanding of 20th century history suggests that Al Qaeda noted some legitimate grievances while others were not factual or misrepresented. For example, the United States did not support Russia's campaign in Chechnya. Additionally, American military campaigns in Afghanistan were in direct response to Al Qaeda's mass killings of noncombatants and Taliban refusal to stop Al Qaeda military activity based in Afghanistan. 1. https://scholarship.tricolib.brynmawr.edu/server/api/core/bitstreams/218e2431-0b76-43ff-8ac5-284ae73d29ad/content https://scholarship.tricolib.brynmawr.edu/server/api/core/bi... Note: this hyperlink may die. The original copy published in The Observer has tragically suffered from link rot.
- kennywinker 5mo agoI guess i needed a /s tag on my comment.