4 ms·
That doesn't seem relevant to responsive design? HTML and CSS are definitely responsive out of the box, but OTOH I remember how many designers of that era thou
by singpolyma3 4mo ago
That doesn't seem relevant to responsive design? HTML and CSS are definitely responsive out of the box, but OTOH I remember how many designers of that era thought responsiveness was a bug and asked devs to add width:920px to body...
- cutler 4mo agoCSS, especially the box model, was not consistent across browsers.
- singpolyma3 4mo agoTrue. Does not prevent the design from being responsive. Even with no CSS at all a design is responsive unless you specifically choose to break that
- codethief 4mo agoRight but how would you even display a vertical menu back then? `float: left` was rather bad, so you went back to using tables[0]. Good luck making these responsive. [0]: and to using dozens of images sliced to fit your table cells, for that cool hover effect as well as round corners. :-)
- joquarky 4mo agoWhy would documents have menus? Menus are for applications. And there was nothing wrong with tables for layout, especially back then when the alternatives were very brittle.
- codethief 4mo ago> Why would documents have menus? Menus are for applications. s/menu/navigation > And there was nothing wrong with tables for layout, especially back then when the alternatives were very brittle. I never said there was anything wrong with tables. OP said there was nothing preventing the design from being responsive, to which I responded yes, there was, at least in a lot of cases. (Responsiveness was also mostly irrelevant back then because smartphones were not a thing yet.)