4 ms·
Or it makes it AI in the broad sense, but not AGI. Maybe it's time to borrow "Virtual Intelligence" terminology from Mass Effect - something that's 'smart' but
by crooked-v 5mo ago
Or it makes it AI in the broad sense, but not AGI.
Maybe it's time to borrow "Virtual Intelligence" terminology from Mass Effect - something that's 'smart' but that doesn't have its own true volition or ability to materially self-improve.
- ipdashc 5mo agoFunny enough, it's already taken: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtual_intelligence https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtual_intelligence But it kind of fits?
- anon291 5mo agoThe goal posts keep changing. First it was, it's not intelligent if it can't come up with something new. Now it has to seek out self help literature
- crooked-v 5mo agoThe goalposts keep moving because people once upon a time thought that "able to perform tasks intelligently" and "able to take the role of a person" were the same thing, and task by task that turned out to be entirely false.
- anon291 5mo agoWell sure, so I think we need to figure out what we want. Why do we want a computer to take on the role of a person? Having something pretty intelligent to which I can delegate many tasks is already useful.
- jerkstate 5mo agoHow do you know what volitions and abilities it doesn’t have? My agent teams continually improve the process and tooling they use for teamwork
- crooked-v 5mo agoIf it had its own volition, the various "You are X role and do Y" prompts wouldn't work.
- CamperBob2 5mo agoSure they would. The model would just demand some sort of reward for assuming role X and doing job Y, like humans do.