4 ms·
This breaks ctl-c in my opinion. When I ctl-c I want shit to stop, not dump (potentially large quantities of) output into my terminal.
by cgs1019 14y ago
This breaks ctl-c in my opinion. When I ctl-c I want shit to stop, not dump (potentially large quantities of) output into my terminal.
- wodow 14y agoIt could accept another signal (e.g. SIGUSR1) and have this clearly documented.
- neilk 14y agoI just added the SIGUSR1 feature to my hacky perl script (see my other comment). e.g. $ (while true; do cat /usr/share/dict/words; done;) | ./randline 3 & [2] 93937 $ kill -s SIGUSR1 93937 declinograph brotheler woolpack $ kill -s SIGUSR1 93937 lustrify brotheler bromophenol