4 ms·
The OP seems unaware that Claude had a lead in this space and captured market share and attention for that reason alone. The test they (supposedly) ran with th
by Aurornis 5mo ago
The OP seems unaware that Claude had a lead in this space and captured market share and attention for that reason alone.
The test they (supposedly) ran with their coworkers to look at PRs from both is such a bad way to compare LLMs that I don’t think they’re very experienced with using them.
- ignoramous 5mo ago> The OP seems unaware that Claude had a lead in this space I remember using GitHub Copilot (OpenAI "Codex" mk1) in Aug 2021 (ChatGPT would launch a year later 2 weeks after Meta's botched Galactica release). Cursor & others took it and ran a mighty good race.
- ixaxaar 5mo agoOkay so regardless of the model, platforms provide attestation from end to end that nothing is being logged from either input or output, including at the firmware and OS level to the extent that the customers have proof of the data never being saved. AFAIK, both GPUs and TPUs support this.
- bluebands 5mo agoClaude had a lead for a few weeks. When Codex launched it was better and it has been (marginally, yes, but still) better since. It's marketing
- jnovek 5mo agoHaving a lead in a new market even for a short time creates initial conditions that are in your favor. That’s why startups get all fired up over being first to market.
- bluebands 5mo agoSure, but OpenAI has caught up with such velocity (and frankly has the better models) such that it's kind of irrational to refuse it based on "vibes"
- NewsaHackO 5mo agoI know it is irrational vibes, but how the whole Department of Defense situation was handled will always make me partial to Anthropic. Unless there so huge shift, of course.
- siva7 5mo agoNo, it wasn't and no one who used Codex and Claude since release could seriously make this claim. It was a magnitude behind Claude and only catched up recently