4 ms·
Yes. Exactly. They have a list of sources which cannot be referenced directly or indirectly. That is enough to discredit them completely.
by SanjayMehta 5mo ago
Yes. Exactly. They have a list of sources which cannot be referenced directly or indirectly.
That is enough to discredit them completely.
- Schiendelman 5mo agoWhat source would you include that they don't allow referencing?
- SanjayMehta 5mo agoTry posting any URL from the Daily Mail. See what happens.
- Schiendelman 5mo agoSo you would source from Daily Mail?
- SanjayMehta 5mo agoMaybe. I'm for viewing all sides of every argument and coming to my own conclusions. Who are these Wikipedo censors? Not one of them has the circular objects between their legs to stand behind their Orwellian editorship.
- Schiendelman 5mo agoI'd love to have a conversation with you, but I'm uninterested in commentary attacking others. It's not appropriate here. When you say maybe, what makes you think it's a valuable source?