As someone in the movement since basically the beginning, this bill is enough in a lot of areas. Subscription games already always had a "no pay, no play" expe

As someone in the movement since basically the beginning, this bill is enough in a lot of areas. Subscription games already always had a "no pay, no play" expectation, so I don't see any problem with that carveout. The only real problem I can see is that in-game purchases in free to play games are not additionally explicitly named. (Though, "no monetary considerations" shouldn't include ftp + mtx) Also, most gamepass games are available for purchase as well, so I don't see the problem there either, except the possibility that a game is removed from gamepass so you lose access despite paying, but that's something for the courts to figure out.