4 ms·
Almost every law that exists about software exists to dictate what a consumer is or isn't allowed to do with software on their own computer using their own hard
by Maxatar 4mo ago
Almost every law that exists about software exists to dictate what a consumer is or isn't allowed to do with software on their own computer using their own hardware.
For once, there is a law that actually dictates the responsibilities that a developer has to the customer, and all that responsibility states is that the developer can not revoke the use of software that a customer has already fully paid for under certain narrow circumstances; somehow this is what you find to be unreasonable?
- duskwuff 4mo agoI think you may have misunderstood the situation I'm outlining: 1. Developer A writes some software. 2. Developer B licenses that software from Developer A, under the terms that (for instance) it only be used internally by Developer B and not disclosed. 3. Developer B makes modifications to that software and uses it as part of the implementation of a video game server. 4. Developer B goes bankrupt. Under this proposed law, Developer B would be obligated to release the modified software, breaching their agreement with Developer A and potentially causing them financial harm.
- circuit10 4mo agoFor new games, they would know from the beginning that they’ll need to release the server software eventually, so they wouldn’t be able to agree with those terms
- db48x 4mo agoIf the this law or something similar had been passed before step 2, then Developer B made a mistake. If the law passed after the game was released, then it doesn’t apply.