3 ms·
Wikipedia doesn't "ban viewpoints". I'm guessing you're referring to their considering some sources as more reliable than others?
by thunderfork 4mo ago
Wikipedia doesn't "ban viewpoints". I'm guessing you're referring to their considering some sources as more reliable than others?
- SanjayMehta 4mo agoYes. Exactly. They have a list of sources which cannot be referenced directly or indirectly. That is enough to discredit them completely.
- Schiendelman 4mo agoWhat source would you include that they don't allow referencing?
- SanjayMehta 4mo agoTry posting any URL from the Daily Mail. See what happens.
- Schiendelman 4mo agoSo you would source from Daily Mail?
- SanjayMehta 4mo agoMaybe. I'm for viewing all sides of every argument and coming to my own conclusions. Who are these Wikipedo censors? Not one of them has the circular objects between their legs to stand behind their Orwellian editorship.
- Schiendelman 4mo agoI'd love to have a conversation with you, but I'm uninterested in commentary attacking others. It's not appropriate here. When you say maybe, what makes you think it's a valuable source?