3 ms·
I fully agree about the documentation aspect. Redline is very much lacking in that area. When we shore up some code related stuff, I am going to working hard o
by spooneybarger 14y ago
I fully agree about the documentation aspect.
Redline is very much lacking in that area. When we shore up some code related stuff, I am going to working hard on documentation that exists outside the code.
- fusiongyro 14y agoCan I infer from this that you aren't planning on the other changes (interfaces, public/private) I mentioned? :)
- spooneybarger 14y agoI wouldn't infer that. I can say, we are aiming for 'standard' Smalltalk compatibility in version one and have had many discussions around diverging and becoming more of a 'inspired by Smalltalk' down the road. There have been numerous discussions around things we would like to add, change etc. Ideally, we want to maintain operability with other Smalltalks but that takes a back seat to building a great tool for the future. We'd welcome participation in getting us to V1 (code, documentation, web design, whatever) as well as participation on the mailing list for coming up with what the 'next gen' of a Smalltalk like language would look like.