> If you have to "market" it, especially with a lot of ad hominem namecalling...maybe it's not science. I'll note that you will never be wheeled into a nuclear

> If you have to "market" it, especially with a lot of ad hominem namecalling...maybe it's not science. I'll note that you will never be wheeled into a nuclear-magnetic resonance machine for imaging, because "OMG it's nuclear!" They were rebranded from NMR to MRI simply because of resistance to the word "nuclear". [If you don't think that NMR/MRI is "science", then perhaps you can take it up with the Nobel physics committee.] The question is: Do you want to wait around for the state of science education to change (the US still is not metric, despite my 3rd grade teacher's assurances in 1974 that change was imminent) or do you want to choose your words carefully enough that even idiots can get past their religious programming?