3 ms·
at the time there was still a school of artificial intelligence that assumed that a big computer running a really sophisticated program could be equiva
by cbr 14y ago
at the time there was still a school of artificial
intelligence that assumed that a big computer running a
really sophisticated program could be equivalent to a
human mind
We're talking theory, so imagine we have extremely powerful hardware, gobs of memory, understand the brain really well, and have some sort of extremely high-resolution scanning device. We could build an "emulator" that would simulate the brain's "hardware" and then load a scan of someone's brain onto it as "software". The system as a whole is just a big computer running a sophisticated program but it's equivalent to a human mind. This mind running on a computer would have the same strengths and
weaknesses as the mind had when running on a biological brain when it comes to determining the truth values of propositions in arithmetic (and everywhere else).
- leephillips 14y agoTo say that a computer program can not, in principle, do what the mind does is not to say that the mind can not exist on a substrate other than the familiar biological one. In your thought experiment the "software" would not be a computer program as we understand it; it would not be a set of algorithms. Also, it is problematic to separate "hardware" and "software", and to define what a "scan" of the brain might be.