3 ms·
That's a pretty low threshold, but isn't the goal of the tax to make you sell the bungalow so someone can live in it? This seems like a policy working as intend
by nemomarx 5mo ago
That's a pretty low threshold, but isn't the goal of the tax to make you sell the bungalow so someone can live in it? This seems like a policy working as intended if it's really worth 350k
- retired 5mo agoDue to zoning (not sure how that translates) nobody can live permanently in the bungalow. It is only for recreational use. Has to do with infrastructure, power delivery, sewage, building standards. If it was allowed to live in that bungalow it would be worth double that.