3 ms·
We’ve never had a central data store that would make it practical to achieve such a feat. Now we have one that could answer questions like this, forever. Mass
by macintux 4mo ago
We’ve never had a central data store that would make it practical to achieve such a feat. Now we have one that could answer questions like this, forever.
Mass surveillance at scale is not a trivial problem to solve, but Flock is both making it happen and making it clear that they are fine with enabling bad actors to take advantage of it.
- Lonestar1440 4mo agoThe FBI has been an IBM customer for a very long time. Like maybe the "cheap cameras everywhere" part is novel + important, but "central data store" truly is not. Slippery reasoning like this is how silly taboos get perpetuated.
- anigbrowl 4mo ago[dead]
- dghlsakjg 4mo agoWhile I don't love the FBI's history of data collection, there is a world of difference between warehousing data from government records, and building a graph of warehoused data from all possible sources and selling access to any small town police chief that can convince the city council to pay for it. Plus, data in FBI custody is nominally subject to laws and oversight in a way that privately held data is not.