4 ms·
> Well for one, we know for certain there is Mythos which is meaningfully better. Do we? Have you used it? What is "meaningfully" better? It's not 3-4 order
by onlyrealcuzzo 5mo ago
> Well for one, we know for certain there is Mythos which is meaningfully better.
Do we?
Have you used it?
What is "meaningfully" better? It's not 3-4 orders of magnitude better. That is definitely happening for smaller models.
- YetAnotherNick 5mo agoWhat do you mean by 3-4 orders of magnitude better? Was Einstein 3-4 order of magnitude better than us? Meaningful in the sense it could find security vulnerabilities in browser and kernel that >99% of the engineers couldn't find.
- onlyrealcuzzo 5mo ago> What do you mean by 3-4 orders of magnitude better? Was Einstein 3-4 order of magnitude better than us? I'm talking about output quality compared to parameter size. Mythos is not 4 orders of magnitude larger than Opus - it's quite possible no LLM model ever reaches that size (likely even), and it's output is only barely better...
- YetAnotherNick 5mo agoWhere did 4 order of magnitude even come from? If I were to guess it is just 5x larger based on the pricing, so not even 1 order of magnitude. > Mythos is not 4 orders of magnitude larger than Opus Again can you define this. How would 4 order of magnitude better look like?