3 ms·
Here (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Almond_cultivation_in_California https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Almond_cultivation_in_Californ...) I have > California produ
by guywithahat 5mo ago
Here (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Almond_cultivation_in_California https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Almond_cultivation_in_Californ...) I have
> California produces 80% of the world's almonds and 100% of the United States commercial supply
But regardless of which number we use, California represents a large portion of US almond production, so much so that misleading could be an acceptable answer if the LLM interpreted the prompt as an exaggeration. I think the example was apt
- ant6n 5mo ago"All almonds are grown in the U.S. state of California." implies "No almonds are grown outside the U.S. state of California." You find one almond tree outside of California that grows almonds, where such almonds are grown intentionally, and the claim is false.
- guywithahat 5mo agoNobody is saying the claim is true. This is a discussion of whether misleading could be a valid answer. I've been arguing if the model interprets the claim as an exaggeration, then misleading would be an acceptable answer, and due to California's dominance in the industry one could reasonably interpret a claim of this nature as an exaggeration. It's fine if you disagree, but I have never claimed the question was true.
- ant6n 5mo agoA statement that is obviously false cannot reasonably be “misleading”.
- guywithahat 5mo agoAn exaggeration can. If I said "the C language was a million times faster than python" that would be an exaggeration. It would both be obviously false (most things are only trivially faster) and misleading. If the LLM interpreted the original statement as an exaggeration, then misleading could be an acceptable answer to a false statement.