3 ms·
I'd move that up a bit! Iran-Contra was around '85, and that involved trading cocaine, which ended up on the streets of the USA, for arms. I think using the 60
by rithdmc 4mo ago
I'd move that up a bit! Iran-Contra was around '85, and that involved trading cocaine, which ended up on the streets of the USA, for arms.
I think using the 60s as a comparison unfairly implies the CIA rehabilitated sooner than should be implied.
- thephyber 4mo agoI suspect the 1960s was chosen because it was before the Church Committee. Back then, the CIA had fewer restrictions about working within the USA.
- rithdmc 4mo agoGot it, thanks. The CIA's cocaine was still ending up on the streets of America during Iran-Contra, though, so I (in my very uninformed opinion!) don't feel like the CIA cared that much.
- thephyber 4mo agoThat’s debatable. It’s likely the cocaine originating from Colombia was going to end up in the US with or without the CIA’s help. Also, it’s worth reading about the journalist who broke the story about Contra-sourced cocaine making it to LA. That journalist is very often misquoted and when he was still alive he tried to fix the missing several times.