3 ms·
Its ugly and not fast for its class, even compared to much cheaper cars. That's a paradigm shift for Ferrari which has always been associated with exclusive pe
by mellosouls 5mo ago
Its ugly and not fast for its class, even compared to much cheaper cars.
That's a paradigm shift for Ferrari which has always been associated with exclusive performance and beauty - and the removal of that USP is why it is seeing such pushback.
- enahs-sf 5mo ago0-60 in 2.5s — faster than a GT3RS, but slower than a 911 turbo S. I guess for north of half a million, you should be able to keep up with the german top dog.
- tobyhinloopen 5mo agoIt’s 0.4 seconds faster than a 50K Model 3 performance. At that point, does it even matter
- darkwater 5mo agoPure acceleration is not everything, especially on track. But I guess a Model S Plaid (RIP) would beat easily a Luce.
- cucumber3732842 5mo agoIt's acceleration by itself isn't noteworthy for it's class but it's a Ferrari and they don't really half ass these things. I'm sure it handles amazingly. Same reason why people buy Porche SUVs instead of 700hp Grand Cherokees (it's a fucking shame they never tossed that engine in the Journey though) or Corvettes instead of Chargers.