Sure, still need to enable access the same info but feels like bucketing the clients into bucket1 = clients that were working just fine before (users and whate

Sure, still need to enable access the same info but feels like bucketing the clients into bucket1 = clients that were working just fine before (users and whatever automation they had in place) bucket2 = ai clients that contributed to, if not flat out caused, the scale problems then slowing down/limiting the bucket2 clients while keeping the bucket1 clients rolling as-is, is both doable and keeps existing customers happy while the underlying infra gets scale/perf improvements needed to support ai clients at scale.