3 ms·
>Actually he provides sources when he analyses stuff and imho much better than the usual corporate You said it was likely an internal leak to the WSJ "accordin
by supern0va 5mo ago
>Actually he provides sources when he analyses stuff and imho much better than the usual corporate
You said it was likely an internal leak to the WSJ "according to Ed Zitron". Did Ed have a source for that, or was it just vibes?
- hansmayer 5mo agoThe source was the article in the WSJ itself, which then referred to their source at the Anthropic. Which kind of is a textbook definition of "leak". Because otherwise Anthropic would have their lawyers hunting both the employee breaking their stringent NDA and the WSJ as well...
- supern0va 5mo agoFair enough, but I have to admit I'm puzzled about why you felt the need to then attribute it to Zitron?
- hansmayer 5mo agoWhy puzzled ? I literally said "According to Ed Zitron", implying that's where I stumbled upon the article. I've no time to read corporate media, at least not regularly.
- supern0va 5mo ago>more like their own leak to WSJ and according to Ed Zitron ^ Apologies, the above read to me like you were saying that Ed himself was claiming that Anthropic leaked to the WSJ.