Why do people keep writing this drivel. Obviously written by an LLM itself. What they are describing and which doesn't work is one shotting a fix. Almost or pro

Why do people keep writing this drivel. Obviously written by an LLM itself. What they are describing and which doesn't work is one shotting a fix. Almost or probably no human can one shot a fix to a significant working system. The human / llm needs to have some form of error correction signal. Either you have a corpus of tests or proof system that prevent regressions. If you have a working system with no tests or validation and let a human loose on it then it will break. How is this different?