4 ms·
We're explicitly not talking about local models here; we're talking about Claude.
by Planktonne 5mo ago
We're explicitly not talking about local models here; we're talking about Claude.
- stavros 5mo agoBecause you're better able to take over the codebase a local model wrote than one Claude wrote? The original question was about taking over an LLM-written codebase, it doesn't sound to me like the argument was about a codebase that Claude, specifically, wrote.
- JoRyGu 5mo agoBrother, look at the first comment in the chain you replied to. It very specifically was about Claude.
- stavros 5mo agoWell, in that case, it's also very specifically about this guy's codebase, so none of us can really say anything on this.
- notachatbot123 5mo agoThe original question is: > What happens when you have a codebase made with claude using this setup and claude is down for let's say 8 hours? So: - A codebase made with Claude - Using this [Claude] setup - Claude is down
- stavros 5mo agoWhat does it matter what the codebase is made with? If Claude is down, use Codex, or Gemini, or Deepseek. That version of the argument is just way too easy to counter.