3 ms·
Is this a serious comment? No one, in an environmental discussion, ignores how much water beef needs. It’s a central part of most vegan/vegetarian commentary.
by jmye 5mo ago
Is this a serious comment? No one, in an environmental discussion, ignores how much water beef needs. It’s a central part of most vegan/vegetarian commentary.
But this is a conversation about data centers. It would be great if you had the capability of staying even vaguely on topic instead of spinning off into “what about” bullshit.
- no-name-here 5mo ago1. Beef uses trillions of gallons of water per year, while data centers use billions - data center water use is nowhere remotely as much as beef. 2. Despite beef using far more water, is it getting anywhere remotely as much coverage as data center water use? 3. Senators like Sanders proposed stopping data center construction nationwide - have senators proposed similar nationwide bans for beef?
- deleted 5mo ago[deleted]
- hunterpayne 5mo agoYou can go ahead and try to do that. Politically, to say its a DOA bill, is the understatement of the century. Also, water is renewable. This entire discussion is absurd and scientifically illiterate. There is a reason why nobody says, "party of science" anymore.
- kennywinker 5mo ago> Also, water is renewable. Tell that to the aquafers we’re emptying that won’t refill for generations. Water is renewable, but not necessarily in the right place or in timely manner. Using treated potable water to cool servers is just taxpayers subsidizing server cooling.
- deleted 5mo ago[deleted]