4 ms·
Your edit is comparing opposites, basically making the ops point for them. You work at google for money. Money is high status under capitalism. You work at Wi
by komali2 4mo ago
Your edit is comparing opposites, basically making the ops point for them.
You work at google for money. Money is high status under capitalism.
You work at Wikipedia for status in the traditional sense - you trade capitalist status (the salary) for the higher actual status of working for a non profit.
- lux-lux-lux 4mo agoNo one thinks non-profit work is ‘high-status.’ People do it because making the world better in some way is more personally motivating than figuring out how to put video ads on refrigerators or whatever.o
- komali2 4mo agoOk, I don't necessarily disagree, but it is thus living your values, which at the very least increases ones self confidence and self perception of status. Whether one thinks that improves one's status in the eyes of others imo depends on one's cynicism. "Whatever, I'm living my values, they just don't get it. Maybe others will one day." That's how I see it for myself anyway, if I'm being honest. But in the end I don't think there's any better path to happiness and fulfillment than living my values.
- harimau777 4mo agoSure, but happiness and fulfillment isn't status. Not because there's anything wrong with them but because that's not what "status" means.
- whimsicalism 4mo agofeeling better because your job fits better in your moral framework that you get from society is a status-mediated effect and i feel you can usually find social scaffolding under things that are articulated as purely intrinsic.
- lux-lux-lux 4mo agoIf words don’t mean what they mean, absolutely