3 ms·
Insane. 3 points behind opus on the artificialanalysis index. Mimo cost ~$400 at the old price, so about $40 today. Opus cost ~$5000 That's over 100x cheaper,
by irthomasthomas 5mo ago
Insane. 3 points behind opus on the artificialanalysis index.
Mimo cost ~$400 at the old price, so about $40 today.
Opus cost ~$5000
That's over 100x cheaper, and just 3 points behind.
I can't wait to experiment with an llm consortium of 100 deepseek and mimo models.
Crazy times.
Shut up and take my m̶o̶n̶e̶y̶ data!
Edit: Gemini on google search told me I could write strikethrough text on hn using <s>. Mimo told me it was unsupported and then went on to list some tags that are supported, like <b>bold</b>. I tried copy pasting the word in strikethrough from a word processor but it lost the format. I ended up using mimo in an agent shell wrapper to produce it, and copy pasting from the terminal worked for some reason.
- noman-land 4mo agoWhat did MiMo say?
- irthomasthomas 4mo agoSays its not supported and lists a few tags that are, like <b>bold</b> Does this work: s̶t̶r̶i̶k̶e̶t̶h̶r̶o̶u̶g̶h̶
- noman-land 4mo agoWell done. Unicode wins again. 𓂺
- deleted 4mo ago[deleted]
- maxdo 4mo agobenchmarks we deserve: google search quick ai answers vs full llm model :)
- irthomasthomas 4mo agosearch answers use Flash 3.5
- maxdo 4mo agothey use a "low" flavor of it to scale it on billions of users
- _davide_ 4mo agoI had a subscription before the price was cut down; the model kept randomly looping the with same character (burning 30% of the budget in one shot), and the overall performance for agentic purposes is, simply put, terrible. It finds non-existing bugs and randomly removes chunks of code to fix them, then even presents it as an "extra fix". Maybe it's a good generalistic model; I haven't tested it in that regard. MiniMax (currently 2.7) which is a ~270B model tuned exclusively for agentic purposes, performs so MUCH better; it's more reliable and cheaper. Both are still far away from Opus 4.7 that I'm using at work. IMO benchmarks are just a very rough estimation; everyone cheats as much as they can get away with. Test the model yourself; do not make any assumptions based on the benchmarks. I would love to see specialized, cheaper, bleeding-edge models like MiniMax for other non-agentic purposes as well. Why pay $1 for a general model when, for example, you can pay $0.1 for a content-moderator model that you actually need?
- zarify 4mo agoFunny, I had the opposite experience with MiniMax and Mimo when using OpenCode. MiniMax got stuck with looping through broken tool calls all the time and MiMo just powered through things and for the most part just worked.
- shanoaice 4mo agosimilarly for me, MiniMax is kind of horrible that it somewhat regularly fall into loops that I had to save it from. DeepSeek & MiMO rarely got stuck. wonder how you get completely reversed experience.
- _davide_ 4mo agoI did develop my own agent around MiniMax. I did see weird behavior when I messed up the loop, like omitting pieces of remove thinking; maybe it's an agent bug, some models/providers just ignore/normalize the broken input, some don't.
- ignoramous 4mo agoSeems like the harness may have to be "finetuned" for models. I've had my share of MiMo 2.5 Pro get stuck in thinking loops with GitHub Copilot.
- megous 4mo agoSo I tried the $16/mo token plan. Burned through 31% of monthly budget in one 1-2h session of a small C project refactoring, saw some not great behavior (hey subagent, read me back these 6 files exactly - which probably burned a lot of output tokens) and will cancel, obviously. This is waaaaay more constrained than even Claude Pro plan, let alone Deepseek V4 or Kimi K2.6 pricing.