> You can live a numb half-life and avoid any crisis that might trigger real change. Changes go both ways and people on the bottom don't have a good track reco

> You can live a numb half-life and avoid any crisis that might trigger real change. Changes go both ways and people on the bottom don't have a good track record regarding changes they experienced in their lives. Is it worth taking a risk for 1 that gets better while statistically 99 will get even worse? Should we rely on letting crisis happen to improve thigs?