3 ms·
When a paper is submitted to a reputable publication references are demanded. You have to let people know where your ideas are supported, or even come from. T
by awesome_dude 5mo ago
When a paper is submitted to a reputable publication references are demanded.
You have to let people know where your ideas are supported, or even come from.
To do anything else is plagiarism.
AI isn't a co-contributer - but it should be referenced - just like a link to a Stack Overflow comment when that's the source of code.
Having AI referenced in the commit is (IMO) best practice - but only co-contributer attributes are available (for now)
- dalemhurley 5mo agoDisagree, I never attributed Laravel Artisan or all the other code generators. Right now you could run Laravel new app (replace with any new framework) and Claude/Cursor/Codex git commit will claim to of created the code.
- awesome_dude 5mo agoTo be fair I've never used Laravel - but I do have a memory of code generators/scaffolders inserting files that made clear they were responsible for work /* * NOTE: This class is auto generated by OpenAPI Generator (https://openapi-generator.tech https://openapi-generator.tech). * Do not edit the class manually. */
- sdevonoes 5mo agoDo I need to write “coauthored by protoc” when pushing grpc changes? “Coauthored by gofmt” when formatting? “Coauthored by React when using npx create-next-app”? No. So, same goes for ai
- awesome_dude 5mo agoHave a look at the top of the files generated by protoc bud ;) It's not in the git commit, it's in the files themselves - is that what you want for AI instead?